SuperviseeAdmin
Team Coaching Supervision Lab · 2026 Cohort

A year of reflective space
for your team coaching practice.

A 12-month, cohort-based online experience for practising team coaches who want to strengthen their impact, stay ethically grounded, and develop confidence working with complexity. A dedicated supervision space to pause, reflect, and make sense of your work — supported by experienced supervisors and a community of peers.

Your supervision schedule

Convert to your timezone
Jul
10
Fri
Next session · in 0 days

Team Coaching Supervision Lab · Session 3

9:00 – 11:00 BST · 2 hours · Zoom
Join Zoom
Preparation notes from your supervisor

Craig and I exchanged thoughts and decided on a reflective practice session inviting thoughts and observations on stakeholder management with a special focus on what might be the ethical considerations. So - here’s the preparation question: As you reflect on your team coaching practice what might be the ethical perspectives to consider when focusing on multi-party stakeholder contracting? See you soon! Thanks from Lise and Craig

Oct
09
Fri
Session 4
Team Coaching Supervision Lab · Session 4
9:00 – 11:00 BST · 2 hours · Zoom
Feb
20
Fri
Session 1 · Completed
Team Coaching Supervision Lab · Session 1
9:00 – 11:00 GMT · 2 hours · Zoom
Completed
May
08
Fri
Session 2 · Completed
Team Coaching Supervision Lab · Session 2
9:00 – 11:00 BST · 2 hours · Zoom
Completed

Team Coaching Supervision Lab · Session 1

1
What we explored
2
Focus areas
3
Looking ahead
01

What we explored

We spent the session on contracting — not as a checklist, but as a lived conversation. A question about AI note-taking opened up into a rich dialogue about presence, trust, confidentiality, and the assumptions we carry into our work.

02

Focus areas

Questions which came alive during our conversation. We’d invite you to reflect on them in the weeks ahead — not to “prepare answers,” but to notice what stirs:

  • Q1

    What does confidentiality actually mean to you in practice — not as a phrase, but in terms of who sees what, who hears what, and where information travels after a session?

  • Q2

    When you enter a team or a system as a coach, what assumptions or "presets" are already running that you may have simply accepted?

  • Q3

    What do you expect from yourself in this supervision group? And what do you need from others in order to show up fully?

03

Looking ahead

For our next session, please come with a question or a case from your team coaching work — something you're curious about, stuck on, or would value other perspectives on. It doesn't need to be polished. The essential context will emerge naturally in conversation.

Team Coaching Supervision Lab · Session 2

1
What we explored
2
Focus areas
3
Looking ahead
01

What we explored

This session moved from contracting into practice. Each of you brought a live question or case from your team coaching work, and rather than solving any one of them, we let the themes cross-pollinate — using your reflections as the entry point for shared learning.

Four threads were laid on the table: the rhythm of sales and marketing when work comes in waves and then goes quiet; stepping into a first team coaching engagement and feeling stuck on how to begin with a team wanting "synergy" around a new system in only three or four sessions; the alignment conversations needed before an engagement, and a returning client asking for something coaching may not be able to give; and staying objective mid-engagement when a leader is steering the agenda, without becoming a tool for that leader.

What surfaced underneath all four was remarkably consistent: a pull toward clarity and a discomfort with the "messy middle." Together we explored the idea of holding the mud rather than rushing to clear it — being a "squashy ball" that absorbs and bounces back the system, taking issues back to the team rather than carrying them ourselves, and trusting that "sufficient clarity to move" (or, as it became, minimum viable clarity) is often enough. The image of jumping onto the team's raft for a stretch of river — then getting off while the team keeps flowing — anchored the conversation, alongside the reminder that mud doesn't stop the river flowing.

You each named where you landed: trusting yourself, trusting the process, trusting the team; fluidity over things set in stone; being a conduit; co-creating rather than consulting. And several of you noticed the session itself was a demonstration of the reflective model we're inviting your teams into.

02

Focus areas

Questions which came alive during our conversation. We’d invite you to reflect on them in the weeks ahead — not to “prepare answers,” but to notice what stirs:

  • Q1

    What are you actually responsible for as a team coach, and where does that responsibility end? When an issue gets handed to you, what makes you pick it up — and what would it take to hold it, or hand it back, instead?

  • Q2

    Where are you reaching for clarity when it may not yet be time for it? What becomes possible if you let "minimum viable clarity" be enough to take the next small step?

  • Q3

    Trust yourself, trust the process, trust the team. When you take on too much, which of these three is the one you're not quite trusting — and what would change if you did?

03

Looking ahead

Our next session will be a reflective practice session inviting thoughts and observations on stakeholder management, with a special focus on what might be the ethical considerations.

A gentle invitation from the conversation: alongside the AI-generated notes on the dashboard, keep your own notes, your own interpretations, your own drawings of the process you're moving through. That personal reflective practice is where the learning settles.

Meet the supervisors

Experienced team coaching supervisors guiding the 2026 cohort.
Dr. Lise Lewis
Dr. Lise Lewis
Co-Founder, GIFTCS · Director, Bluesky International
Author · Executive & Relational Leadership Coach · Team Coach · Coaching Supervisor · Trainer
Highly experienced coach, mentor, and award-winning supervisor whose work centres on creating reflective spaces where practitioners deepen their awareness and effectiveness. Drawing on her doctoral research in relational leadership and feedback, she helps coaches, mentors, and team coaches strengthen their practice through supervision that balances support, challenge, and growth.
Craig McKenzie
Craig McKenzie
Co-Founder, GIFTCS · Director of Academy, Transcend International
Core Faculty, Clutterbuck Coaching and Mentoring International · Coach · Coach Educator · Supervisor
An international coach, coach educator, supervisor, and organisational leader with extensive experience in developing accredited coaching programmes and advancing team coaching globally. A reflective learner, Craig brings depth and wisdom to supervision, creating a supportive space where coaches can flourish and enhance their practice.
In partnership with
The Global Institute For Team Coaching Supervision
Visit giftcs.org